PDA

View Full Version : MIC ZAMBIDES VS PARR 2(FULL THAI RULES)


deanspartan
28-11-2002, 07:09 PM
I have not seen the first bout thus i can not remark but from the little i've read there are more than a few who feel it was exceptionally close.Stan himself conceded that had the fight been held anywhere else that JWP would have won!!
Would it not make sense for these guys to settle this over 5 rounds of Full Thai Rules??
What do you all think the outcome would be and why ?
Im sure Tarik would be thrilled to put it on and both Zam/JWP i'm certain would love nothing more.
P.S- How about Stan Vs Briggs in a boxing bout as the main event??If Howard Leighs article was on the money about Stan venturing back to boxing after 15 years this would certainly bring the fans in. Hell,i would even fly down to see that one.NOW WHAT DO THINK HAPPEN THERE FIGHTFANS???? The fight weight could be a catch weight between Cruiser and Heavy.
As Big Kev would say IM EXCITED!!!

Nick
28-11-2002, 08:24 PM
No, that would be silly. Zambidis has absolutely no experience in Full Thai and to fight Parr just like that with elbows is plain silly. That's unfair to Mike. Why not 12 rounds of kickboxing? Both are supposedly proficient at boxing and kicking. If not that, then K-1 rules again for the rematch as it at least gives Wayne something to combat Mike's hands with.
Where did Stan say Wayne would have won if the fight was held somewere else? Very curious to know.

Howard Leigh's article about Stan going to boxing was complete garbage. He is making things up again. He did that once before, back in 99.

goldenharvest
28-11-2002, 08:33 PM
Yeah your probably right Zam would have a hard time under full thai but you dont have to be a bloody genius to figure that one . I reckon that JWP would brutally ko Zammy inside 3 rounds full thai.
As for Paul vs Stan at say 90kg i reckon Paul would put him in intensive care for the month.Cmon maty Stan deserves a better last few fights than that-he aint F****N SILLY.He saw what happened to Tosca.Which is probably who he will fight and would be lucky to survive that.Forget Greeks Vs Turks CELTS RULE BROTHERS.what ya rekon Tarik- Celts VS Greeks.Shut up those Melbourne PUNCES once and for F****N ALL.

***** jam

deanspartan
28-11-2002, 09:51 PM
Hello Nick !You should have clarified this with Stan himself since you were on the phone not that long ago. Had you asked,im certain he would have informed you that he said that personally to JWP on the night!As for the rules to be contested i am more than certain that JWP would even fight Zambides in a boxing match without any worry at all-over 10 rounds as there would not be a title on the line. Although from a fans point it would be great to see Zambides emulate Stans feat of also fighting in Thailand under full thai rules and JWP would be a great opponent to establish himself as a credible champion under ANY rules.He may like to have a few fights prior in order to prepare.Although i dont think Stan had any elbow fights prior to the Kirkwood Walker fight which was sanctioned for the WMC World title if im not mistaken and which he defended in Thailand under full thai rules against the late Andy Hug if my memory serves me correctly??I think Andy Kod him in the first with a straight right but i'll have to check that as my video collection is currently in a state of utter chaos.
Golden Harvest your chosen name is quite puzzling as i can not comprehend how Bruce Lees old filmakers have anything remotely in common with the Celts.As for Greeks Vs Celts i would strongly suggest you take a look at your calender!!What you may find is that the Year is 2002CE NOT 500BCE.The Clasical Greeks no longer exist nor do the Celts.Secondly the fighters are both Australian and furthermore if you feel compelled to indulge in some fantasia then you and all those intent on EXPLOITING THE FIGHT GAME in order to promote RACIAL TENSION or pursue personal agendas should be content in hiring out Books/Videos such as Spartacus,The Second Punic War,the 300 Spartans and maybe even Quo Vadis.Good luck Goldy as you appear to be one of many sick puppies.
Cheers....Dean.

Nick
28-11-2002, 10:01 PM
Dean, Dean, Dean. You must have a lot of hate for Stan and Mike. Actually, you have too much dislike in you period. Was it worth making a whole new name (goldenharvest???) just to trash them? In a way it's good that Mike's win has his knockers besides themself. That's worrying though man, let that negativity go dude, it's like a weight off your shoulders.
Try changing your writing style a bit if you want to indulge in the boring and obvious act of changing names to bag someone. The random caps, not putting a space after full stops, saying JWP would "brutally ko zambidis in 3 rounds" (you've been saying that exact phrase as Dean Tsiros for aaaaages) and other assorted bits and pieces just makes it too obvious. ;)

Oh, let me guess, I'm wrong and don't know what I'm talking about? Who was the sick puppy? I didn't know you were that off the planet man!

JWP
28-11-2002, 11:05 PM
Nick,
After the fights on the stairs out side the venue Stan said that we had a awesome fight and any where else in the world I would have won the fight. Just seems Melbourne I have trouble winning for some reason?
JWP

deanspartan
29-11-2002, 12:04 AM
HOW DARE YOU !!!HOW ****ING DARE YOU NICK!I HAVE ALWAYS RESPONDED TO YOUR STAND OVER TACTICS AND PUTDOWNS WITH LOGIC AND CIVILITY BUT YOU HAVE GONE TOO FAR!! IM NOT GOING TO CHANGE MY WRITING STYLE DUE TO SOME REDNECK WRITING TRASH OR COPYING MY STYLE, NOR AM I GOING TO DEFEND MYSELF FROM YOUR OBSURD AND OBSENE ACUSATIONS AS IT IS QUITE CLEAR IN MY MIND THAT IT MAY WELL HAVE BEEN YOU OR ONE OF YOUR CRONY MATES NICK.
IT IS PAINFULLY OBVIOUS SHERLOCK THAT DEAN SPARTAN AND DEAN TSIROS ARE ONE AND THE SAME.I HAVE STATED THAT ON MORE THAN ONE OCASION ON SEVERAL SITES AND USE THAT NAME FOR HUMOUR(YOU IMBECILE).
I TAKE GREAT PRIDE IN WHAT I HAVE TO SAY AND THAT IS WHY UNLIKE YOU NICK AGAS FROM OKLEIGH SOUTH I DO NOT HAVE TO TRASH PEOPLE UNDER AN ALIAS:UNLIKE YOU NICK(OR NEMESIS)OR WHATEVER OTHER NAMES YOU HAVE USED IN THE PAST.YOU SEE NICK I DONT MIND YOUR PUTTING OTHERS DOWN SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY DONT AGREE WITH YOUR OPINIONS.I DONT EVEN MIND THAT YOU FELT THE NEED TO SEND ME THREATNING PERSONAL EMAILS STATING'I HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND DEAN'ETC ETC BUT DO NOT EVER ACUSE ME OF ENGAGING IN THAT GUTLESS ****.
IT IS GREAT THAT YOU HAVE A DEEP LIKING FOR STAN EVEN IF IT DOES SEEM A BIT UNNATURAL.THATS RIGHT PEOPLE MAY THINK YOUR A ****** NICK.TAKE MY ADVICE AND STOP TRYING TO BULLY AND STAND OVER OTHERS SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY DISAGREE AND MOST IMPORTANTLY SHERLOCK DO NOT ACUSE PEOPLE OR EVEN WORSE TRY AND SET THEM UP PURELY BECAUSE YOU DONT LIKE THEM OR DISAGREE WITH WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY.
ON THAT NOTE -GET ****ED!DEAN SPARTAN(DEAN TSIROS).

deanspartan
29-11-2002, 12:06 AM
HOW DARE YOU !!!HOW ****ING DARE YOU NICK!I HAVE ALWAYS RESPONDED TO YOUR STAND OVER TACTICS AND PUTDOWNS WITH LOGIC AND CIVILITY BUT YOU HAVE GONE TOO FAR!! IM NOT GOING TO CHANGE MY WRITING STYLE DUE TO SOME REDNECK WRITING TRASH OR COPYING MY STYLE, NOR AM I GOING TO DEFEND MYSELF FROM YOUR OBSURD AND OBSENE ACUSATIONS AS IT IS QUITE CLEAR IN MY MIND THAT IT MAY WELL HAVE BEEN YOU OR ONE OF YOUR CRONY MATES NICK.
IT IS PAINFULLY OBVIOUS SHERLOCK THAT DEAN SPARTAN AND DEAN TSIROS ARE ONE AND THE SAME.I HAVE STATED THAT ON MORE THAN ONE OCASION ON SEVERAL SITES AND USE THAT NAME FOR HUMOUR(YOU IMBECILE).
I TAKE GREAT PRIDE IN WHAT I HAVE TO SAY AND THAT IS WHY UNLIKE YOU NICK AGAS FROM OKLEIGH SOUTH I DO NOT HAVE TO TRASH PEOPLE UNDER AN ALIAS:UNLIKE YOU NICK(OR NEMESIS)OR WHATEVER OTHER NAMES YOU HAVE USED IN THE PAST.YOU SEE NICK I DONT MIND YOUR PUTTING OTHERS DOWN SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY DONT AGREE WITH YOUR OPINIONS.I DONT EVEN MIND THAT YOU FELT THE NEED TO SEND ME THREATNING PERSONAL EMAILS STATING'I HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND DEAN'ETC ETC BUT DO NOT EVER ACUSE ME OF ENGAGING IN THAT GUTLESS ****.
IT IS GREAT THAT YOU HAVE A DEEP LIKING FOR STAN EVEN IF IT DOES SEEM A BIT UNNATURAL.THATS RIGHT PEOPLE MAY THINK YOUR A ****** NICK.TAKE MY ADVICE AND STOP TRYING TO BULLY AND STAND OVER OTHERS SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY DISAGREE AND MOST IMPORTANTLY SHERLOCK DO NOT ACUSE PEOPLE OR EVEN WORSE TRY AND SET THEM UP PURELY BECAUSE YOU DONT LIKE THEM OR DISAGREE WITH WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY.
ON THAT NOTE -GET ****ED!DEAN SPARTAN(DEAN TSIROS).

deanspartan
29-11-2002, 12:08 AM
HOW DARE YOU !!!HOW F#####G DARE YOU NICK!I HAVE ALWAYS RESPONDED TO YOUR STAND OVER TACTICS AND PUTDOWNS WITH LOGIC AND CIVILITY BUT YOU HAVE GONE TOO FAR!! IM NOT GOING TO CHANGE MY WRITING STYLE DUE TO SOME REDNECK WRITING TRASH OR COPYING MY STYLE, NOR AM I GOING TO DEFEND MYSELF FROM YOUR OBSURD AND OBSENE ACUSATIONS AS IT IS QUITE CLEAR IN MY MIND THAT IT MAY WELL HAVE BEEN YOU OR ONE OF YOUR CRONY MATES NICK.
IT IS PAINFULLY OBVIOUS SHERLOCK THAT DEAN SPARTAN AND DEAN TSIROS ARE ONE AND THE SAME.I HAVE STATED THAT ON MORE THAN ONE OCASION ON SEVERAL SITES AND USE THAT NAME FOR HUMOUR(YOU IMBECILE).
I TAKE GREAT PRIDE IN WHAT I HAVE TO SAY AND THAT IS WHY UNLIKE YOU NICK AGAS FROM OKLEIGH SOUTH I DO NOT HAVE TO TRASH PEOPLE UNDER AN ALIAS:UNLIKE YOU NICK(OR NEMESIS)OR WHATEVER OTHER NAMES YOU HAVE USED IN THE PAST.YOU SEE NICK I DONT MIND YOUR PUTTING OTHERS DOWN SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY DONT AGREE WITH YOUR OPINIONS.I DONT EVEN MIND THAT YOU FELT THE NEED TO SEND ME THREATNING PERSONAL EMAILS STATING'I HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND DEAN'ETC ETC BUT DO NOT EVER ACUSE ME OF ENGAGING IN THAT GUTLESS ****.
IT IS GREAT THAT YOU HAVE A DEEP LIKING FOR STAN EVEN IF IT DOES SEEM A BIT UNNATURAL.THATS RIGHT PEOPLE MAY THINK YOUR A F####T NICK.TAKE MY ADVICE AND STOP TRYING TO BULLY AND STAND OVER OTHERS SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY DISAGREE AND MOST IMPORTANTLY SHERLOCK DO NOT ACUSE PEOPLE OR EVEN WORSE TRY AND SET THEM UP PURELY BECAUSE YOU DONT LIKE THEM OR DISAGREE WITH WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY.
ON THAT NOTE -GET F####D!DEAN SPARTAN(DEAN TSIROS).

Nick
29-11-2002, 12:31 AM
Nope, that won't work. It's not my fault you felt the need to swap names to take the piss. If you try and elicit a reaction, you will get one.
I'm easy to get in contact with big fella, if you want to make an issue about it, throw me an email, I'll give you my number and I can talk to you one on one.

deanspartan
29-11-2002, 12:33 AM
HOW DARE YOU MATE! HOW F####N DARE YOU !NICK IT IS PAINFULLY OBVIOUS THAT YOU ENJOY STANDING OVER AND PUTTING DOWN THOSE THAT DISAGREE WITH YOU.YOU HAVE GONE AS FAR IN THE PAST AS SENDING ME THREATNING EMAILS AND IT SEEMS AS THOUGH YOU STOP AT NOTHING TO SILENCE THOSE WHO DO NOT AGREE WITH YOU.YOU ARE NOT ONLY A SAD CHARACTER BUT A BITTER SOUR TWISTED AND VERY MUCH DELUDED CHARACTER WHOSE LIFE SEEMS TO REVOLVE AROUND STAN AND HIS BOY MIKE.HEY IM NOT JUDGING YOU AND IM GLAD THEY BRING YOU SO MUCH HAPINESS BUT YOU HAVE GONE TOO FAR THIS TIME MISTER.DO NOT MAKE ACUSATIONS AGAINST PEOPLE WHO ARE INNOCENT SHERLOCK.THE NAME DEAN SPARTAN AND DEAN TSIROS ARE ONE AND THE SAME AS I HAVE STATED THAT ON SEVERAL MESSAGE BOARDS THUS IT IS NO SECRET(YOU IMBECILE),IT IS USED FOR HUMOUR.I NICK UNLIKE YOU TAKE GREAT PRIDE IN MY COMMENTS AND WOULD NEVER HAVE POSTED UNDER MY REAL NAME IF I WAS LIKE YOU NICK A GUTLESS INDIVIDUAL WITH ALIAS SUCH AS NEMESIS AND A HOST OF OTHERS YOU AND YOUR CRONIES USE.I WILL NOT CHANGE MY WRITING STYLE BECAUSE YOU , YOUR MATES OR SOME REDNECK DECIDES TO COPY.
YOU ARE A DISCRACE NICK AGAS FROM OKLEIGH SOUTH IN MELBOURNE!!!!

Nick
29-11-2002, 12:37 AM
Yes mate, me and my cronies set you up. You got me.

Nick
29-11-2002, 12:40 AM
BTW, I never said you were trying to keep deanspartan and Dean Tsiros as separate identities.

harls
29-11-2002, 12:46 AM
Just relax guys! remember this is just a forum where you swap ideas, listen to other peoples opinions and share your own. I do believe the topic is about a rematch between JWP and Mike. My opinion is that a rematch of any sort between these two, would be a treat in any form. JWP deserves a rematch after the very dodgy decision Tuesday night and for the chance to win in Melbourne town! The K-1 rules I feel were fair as JWP had to leave his elbows at home(a disadvantage) and Mike had to add knees to his arsenal(a disadvantage). So why not the same rules(modified thai/K-1). :)

Nick
29-11-2002, 01:19 AM
His reaction pretty much justifies what I said. He accused me of being Nemesis or whoever, of having my crony mates posting blah blah...big deal, I wouldn't react like that.
If he wants to speak to me, I'm not hard to contact. If I found out I'm wrong, I'd honestly apologize in a second,but judging by his reaction, I don't think so. Anyway, this disgraceful, standover man, gangster, bully, ****** or whatever I am can't be bothered with the inevitable slanging match, so like I said, I am easy to contact if its some sort of huge issue.

Brept
19-12-2002, 02:34 PM
jwp would cut Zambides to shreads with his elbows the fight would not be a good match up with jwp stopping Zambides.