PDA

View Full Version : Who are the absolute best?


Glass Jaw
29-08-2002, 08:32 PM
In any rules, between the following guys, any weight.
Even considering a few have now retired.

Elson, Parr, Dawson, Ozkan, Kara, Dalton, Chopper, Pond, Zam, Cope, Collard, Halford, Tsakonos, Prince, Oliver Olsen, Soliman, Tui, Raph Tai, Danny Tai, Behic, Nezif, McNaught, Corbett, Tank, Simpson, Hull, Curovic, Conche, Foley, White, Kemspon, C. Allen, J.Allen, Steele, Zammit, Reece, Forrester, Finlayson, Noi, Redden, Burton, Monkongtong, Mcphie, S.Misich
N. Misich, Rhino, Eugene "Boom Boom" Ekkelboom, Lek, DeVanna, Walker.


My top 15 in any order, any rules, any weight would be:

Dawson, Parr, Zam, Ozkan, Halford, Collard, Chopper, Elson, Monkongtong and DeVanna (spelling?), Kara, Raph Tai, Behic, Nezif, Tsakonos (spelling?).


Next - Burton, Redden and Soliman, Cope, Olsen, Curovic, Eugene, McPhie, Noi, Zammit, Prince, Bannan, Corbett.


Then the other guys i suppose.


A lot of these will be controversial in other people's minds, which is cool, and some i will have forgotten and or misplaced, but this is my general consensus.

Let me know who you feel are the top dogs in the ring.

Apparently Behic vs Parr, Curovic v DeVanna, and Ozkan vs Halford are signed, and with the 8 man tounrey's happening, the light should be a little clearer.

Good year for kick/Thai boxing!

Koshy
31-08-2002, 05:15 PM
Mate, Arthur Tzkannos is very lucky to be in the top round of the first lot. Who has he beat to be in there?

Glass Jaw
01-09-2002, 03:18 PM
Koshy - he's been in there with Gurkan and Halford, did well against Halford, and i actually based it on that performance.

More based on skill than competition though.

Thanks

Koshy
01-09-2002, 08:57 PM
So, that means that a guy like Ian Jacobs who has beaten Ozkan, Tai, Westerman, Soliman, doesn't qualify in the top list? But Arthur who fought to a draw against Halford and lost to Ozkan is rated higher? The other thing you have to consider is that guys like Preacher, and Bannon are both ex world champs but they dont qualify in front of Arthur? Im sorry but he shouldn;t be in the top 50 until he actually BEATS somone half decent.

Glass Jaw
01-09-2002, 10:33 PM
Absolutely...............in my opinion if you put Arthur in there with Jacobs right now, Ian would be in trouble!
Hence, Arthur rates higher.

Koshy
03-09-2002, 05:06 PM
Thats a fine thing to say but what facts or stats do you have to back this up? I have nothing against him other than the fact that he is building a name even though he hasn't beaten anyone. If im wrong tell me who he beat!